Chat Logs

  1. * HamAdams joined #java
  2. * LtHummus joined #java
  3. * ChaiTRex joined #java
  4. * ChaiTRex joined #java
  5. * ChaiTRex joined #java
  6. * ChaiTRex joined #java
  7. * mindCrime joined #java
  8. * michele joined #java
  9. * stfstfm joined #java
  10. * cheeser joined #java
  11. * Zapek joined #java
  12. * bullshark joined #java
  13. * cheeser joined #java
  14. * stfstfm joined #java
  15. * bullshark joined #java
  16. * michele joined #java
  17. * pebble joined #java
  18. * michele joined #java
  19. * iwtga joined #java
  20. * BSaboia joined #java
  21. * handicraftsman joined #java
  22. * Afroboy joined #java
  23. * PocketKiller joined #java
  24. * jreicher joined #java
  25. * HamAdams joined #java
  26. * MikeBux joined #java
  27. * Afroboy joined #java
  28. * bullshark joined #java
  29. * sa02irc joined #java
  30. * metalmaniac joined #java
  31. * skum joined #java
  32. * Afroboy joined #java
  33. * Cae2 joined #java
  34. * Dukorr joined #java
  35. * Afroboy joined #java
  36. * GreenResponse joined #java
  37. dreamrealhttps://bytecode.news/posts/2026/07/identifying-the-actors-what-a-byline-actually-certifies
  38. * Afroboy joined #java
  39. dreamrealIf you're on hacker news, I'd appreciate an upvote: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49082489
  40. nevetIdentifying the Actors: What a Byline Certifies | Hacker News
  41. dreamreal(I think the article's written well, but it ain't short.)
  42. GreenResponsepersonally I kill AI with fire wherever I find it. Good thing Firefox has a killswitch for that
  43. GreenResponseI hate this AI hype
  44. dreamrealThat's dumb and impossible
  45. dreamrealbut I get it
  46. GreenResponsebut I realise that it’s a godsend for technical people that have problems with articulating their thoughts, pretty much most of the people
  47. dreamrealyou're in good company: you're doing the same thing headius did
  48. * Cae2 joined #java
  49. * acidsys joined #java
  50. * jreicher joined #java
  51. Paradreamreal: fwiw I recommend using Co-Authored-By trailers in commits with some pseudoidentity for LLMs et al. This pairs well with "commit in small pieces, commit often". Of course it's still a human process and most don't even really know how to add commit message trailers but I don't see any better way of doing it at this point beyond some completely hands-off commit authoring process with a
  52. Paraseparate diff-by-diff signing process.
  53. * jamezp joined #java
  54. dreamreali don't see the point
  55. dreamrealI mean, I do, but really... why
  56. ParaRequirements are in flux, my previous project where my involvement just ended had a LLM authoring policy change where they do want people to clearly highlight which content came from where and I'm happy I don't have to solve that there :)
  57. ParaThe trailers is a nifty and underutilized feature IMHO in general, although they're more useful for the reviewed-by and other such metadata which they usually are used to.
  58. dreamrealI guess I understand the need for provenance, but even so: what does it DO?
  59. ParaIt's a good lightweight solution to red tape.
  60. dreamrealif the code works - like, tested, the verification is present - then why does it matter?
  61. dreamreal"oh no, that line came from qwen, THAT one from gemma4, THAT one from... oh, it's from Sam, ew."
  62. ParaFingerpointing/blame, I'd imagine.
  63. ParaHow dare you make mistakes etc.
  64. * dreamreal is so overjoyed at being reminded that people are stupid
  65. dreamrealI can't wait until the world realizes that I KNOW THIS ALREADY, being stupid myself, and don't need further reminding
  66. ParaOr Totally Accurate Stats such as "70% of bugs involved ChatGPT"
  67. ParaOr Even More Relevant Stats such as "55% of production critical bugs were reviewed by John Random, fire him!"
  68. ParaTBH while I'm the kind of metadata fan who likes this stuff but I can see lots of abuse potential for all these, but alas...
  69. dreamreali don't mind the metadata, I guess, I just don't see how it's actually useful
  70. dreamrealit can be interesting
  71. dreamrealbut to me the metric is "does the code effin' WORK" and "do we know why we can make that assertion"
  72. ParaOn that I'd rather use the metadata for adding e.g. CI process marking commits as Tested-By or somesuch.
  73. ParaLike, since it's possible, why the hell not.
  74. ParaOf course this means hand-over and history rewriting which will make the human part harder.
  75. dreamrealWell, tested-by still relies on HITL, because the specs don't necessarily factor in properly
  76. ParaIt's better suited for manual testing, sure.
  77. ParaAnd in a sense that makes sense even. But then one needs to teach the manual testers how to do it or build a "click here to mark this tested" minitool or whatever...
  78. ParaAll doable, and kinda very interesting, but still...yeah I don't know what the point would be :)
  79. dreamrealEw, not THAT kind of manual testing
  80. dreamrealI mean, that's good, QA people are worth their weight in gold, but ... ew
  81. Parahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMRgdpXLElE
  82. nevetYouTube: look at this graph | Gappy
  83. * ChaiTRex joined #java
  84. * Dukorr joined #java
  85. * Afroboy joined #java
  86. * Afroboy joined #java
  87. * stfstfm_ joined #java
  88. * stfstfm joined #java
  89. * GreenResponse joined #java
  90. * Anaphaxeton joined #java
  91. * hwpplayer1 joined #java
  92. * Ragnor joined #java
  93. * Anaphaxeton joined #java
  94. hassoon'evening
  95. * kathadris joined #java
  96. dreamrealhi
  97. * Anaphaxeton joined #java
  98. * metalmaniac joined #java
  99. * Anaphaxaway joined #java
  100. * Fiji joined #java
  101. * Fiji joined #java
  102. * LtHummus joined #java