ByteCode.NewsSubmit
Use quotes for an exact word.

Subscribe

RSSPodcast
Log in

Community

Chat Logs

Saturday, October 17, 2026 (America/New_York)

  1. phalethany way to subscribe to a task? https://repopack.com/project/repopack/tasks/283
  2. phalethalso to this one https://repopack.com/project/repopack/tasks/283
  3. phalethhmm, the URL in the address bar of repopack website does not update
  4. phaleththis one I mean https://repopack.com/project/flog/tasks/42
  5. phalethwell I opened that one, means I'm subscribed
  6. phalethrcompat has docs, that means yet another Containerfile to update
  7. bluecurrently there's no way to subscribe to a task
  8. bluephaleth: https://rcompat.repopack.app
  9. nevetrcompat — JavaScript standard library
  10. phalethdoes rcompat have a domain?
  11. bluenot currently
  12. blueI want to buy stdlib.org... but it's expensive. aftersale costs of $800
  13. bluethen I could create js.stdlib.org and rcompat.stdlib.org
  14. blue$8000*
  15. bluenot worth it currently
  16. bluethe repopack subdomain is ok
  17. phalethcare to merge my Containerfile change?
  18. bluedone
  19. phalethyeah, well, not sure why have those docs anyway, more burnt tokens it seems
  20. blueI haven't really touched those docs in a week or so
  21. bluebut they will be necessary for launch
  22. bluecurrently I'm just finishing flog and primate 0.43
  23. phalethso repopack is gonna link there?
  24. bluethat's where most of the tokens are going
  25. blueyes
  26. blueif you click on the three dots phaleth
  27. blueit already links to the docs
  28. phalethok, means repopack#283 is going
  29. blueyes
  30. phaletheh, I filed a bug abou three dots
  31. phalethbut I guess I know what you mean
  32. bluewhat bug?
  33. blueah, 679
  34. blueit's not those three dots
  35. blueit's the lower left three dots
  36. bluebtw phaleth, did you notice the ability to comment was removed?
  37. blueit's something you wanted :P
  38. phalethyeah, those do not link to rcompat docs
  39. blueyes, they link to the repopack docs
  40. bluethat's the task of yours I just merged
  41. phalethnoticed, but the comment textarea is still there
  42. blueyes. you need it for review/revision actions
  43. bluehttps://repopack.com/project/rcompat/tasks/41
  44. bluefinally will be able to get rid of happy-dom. man I hate that dependency, it's so broken
  45. phalethwhat I mean is if there is gonna be any link to rcompat.repopack.app anywhere
  46. bluethe advantage of the agentic age, we don't need to put up with subpar deps anymore
  47. blueoh
  48. bluewhere do you want to link it?
  49. blueI created it because dreamreal has a friend moving from deno to bun, and dreamreal told him to move to rcompat instead so he's flexible, but didn't have any docs website to point him to
  50. phalethwell, I think rcompat.repopack.app is a good candidate to have it's own custom domain once that's going to be implemented
  51. blueyes I agree. best would be rcompat.stdlib.org ...
  52. phaleththe custom domain could still be a subdomain
  53. blueyes
  54. bluebut I don't yet own stdlib.org
  55. phalethnah, but paying $8k is dumb
  56. blueand I don't really want to get rcompat.dev or whatever. because rcompat should be a transitory tool until we get "std:" in all runtimes
  57. bluemaybe rcompat.primate.run
  58. bluebut really, the repopack.app subdomain is ok for now I think
  59. phalethno, that's not ok
  60. blueremember, esbuild still runs on esbuild.github.io
  61. blueit's ok to just run certain things directly on repopack.app without a domain
  62. phalethfor example rcompat.primate.run is already good enough cause that has a DNS record
  63. bluethere's no rule saying everything needs a custom domain
  64. phalethrcompat.repopack.app is under asterisk domain, so it's not discoverable
  65. blueI think rcompat.repopack.app is fine
  66. phalethbut for github there are rules how static sites are discoverable and since github is big bots just learned that
  67. phalethok, up to you
  68. blueI'm not even sure I want a strong association with primate
  69. blueI wrote it originally for primate, but it's universal
  70. bluebtw what do you think about the logo clanker came up with?
  71. bluedreamreal's friend said it reminded him of reddit, lol
  72. phalethdidn't notice any logo
  73. bluercompat.repopack.app
  74. blueupper left
  75. phalethyeah, that's like reddit
  76. blueyes
  77. phalethnot suitable for favicon
  78. blueopen to improvements :P
  79. bluemaybe we can ask your gf
  80. blueprimate still uses her logo...
  81. phalethyeah, I told her
  82. bluethanks
  83. phalethI mean not that we need logo, she refused to create one for repopack way back already
  84. blueya I understand, people are busy
  85. phalethI guess painting in photoshop is not what she does anymore
  86. blueya
  87. phalethI'll put in some favicon and some svg in static dir there
  88. bluek